Legal Opinion

Gunderson v. Cochrane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1892No. 281PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from, Superior Court, King County. Motion to strike statement of facts from the record.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

The respondent moves to strike the statement of facts because the judge before whom the cause was tried settled the statement after he had gone out of office, and, under the authority of Faulconer v. Warner, 2 Wash. 525 (27 Pac. Rep. 274), the motion must be granted. But appellant contends that he has lost his right of appeal in this case without any fault of his, and that under such circumstances this court should grant him a new trial. He cites us..to a number of cases where courts of last resort in other states have upon such grounds…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Faulconer v. WarnerWashington Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hallam v. TillinghastWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Nelson v. Seattle Traction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Gordon v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API