Legal Opinion

United States v. Edward Sullivan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 28, 2014No. 12-10196, 12-10217PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IKUTA, Circuit Judge:

Edward Sullivan was convicted of violations under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251(a) and 2252(a)(4)(B) for producing and possessing a sexually explicit video depicting a fourteen-year-old girl. He raises multiple challenges to these convictions, as well as to the mandatory minimum sentences im posed under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251(e) and 2252(b)(2). The government cross appeals, arguing that the district court miscalculated Sullivan’s Sentencing Guidelines range. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm in part and reverse in part. 1

I

Sullivan’s…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Edward SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Richard BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Michael LustigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. Jason WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  5. Sandoval v. County of SonomaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API