Legal Opinion

Ogburn v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1930No. Docket No. 513PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries received by the plaintiff in a collision between an automobile driven by her, and a railroad train operated by defendants. A nonsuit was granted by the trial court on the sole ground of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff, and the only question here presented is whether such negligence may be imputed to her as a matter of law, under the facts shown.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable' to appellant, the following facts appear: The accident occurred at a point where the single track of the respondent railroad crosses…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Koster v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Clark v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Toschi v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Landers v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Pennington v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Eastman v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API