Legal Opinion
United States v. Fred Ferrara
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 26, 1972No. 534, Docket 71-2121PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, Circuit Judge:
These appeals graphically depict how corrupt labor union officials can use their positions to promote their own selfish interests at the expense of the interests of those they ostensibly represent.
Appellants Fred Ferrara, Arthur Russell, Elmer Hauck and George Papalexis 1 were convicted after a three- day non-jury trial in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, Milton Pollack, District Judge, of conspiring to violate and of violating §§ 302(a)(1), (a)(4) and (b)(1) of the Taft-Hartley Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 186(a) (1), (a)(4) and (b)(1) (1970), by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Antonio Corallo, Henry Fried, Daniel J. Motto and S. T. Grand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Elmo T. Christianson and Herman Paster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. Leonard Russo and David WengerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Fred Ferrara and Arthur RussellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Vinal S. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Harry BernsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. FinkelsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.