Legal Opinion
Corrado Bros., Inc. v. Twin City Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided July 19, 1989PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, Justice:
This is an appeal from a decision of the Superior Court, after a bench trial, awarding judgment for a retrospective premium on workmen’s compensation insurance. The Superior Court ruled that the insurance carrier, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, a subsidiary of Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”), was entitled to recover the sum of $48,617 from the defendant, Corrado Brothers, Inc. (“Corra-do”), which sum represented workmen’s compensation benefits paid by Hartford during the 1981 premium year to settle a claim of a Corrado employee. The trial court rejected…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
- Levitt v. BouvierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
- Emp. Surplus Line Ins. v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Loft, Inc. v. GuthCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1938
- Transport Indemnity Co. v. Dahlen Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Dunlap v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Pellaton v. Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. AIG Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Crosse v. BCBSD, INC.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- Pierce v. International Ins. Co. of Ill.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.