Legal Opinion

State v. El-Tabech

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 2000No. S-99-558PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

This appeal presents the question, What procedure, if any, may a prisoner, alleging actual innocence, use to request state-funded DNA testing when the time period has passed in which to file a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence? The appellant, Mohamed El-Tabech, was convicted before the availability of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) fingerprinting. After such testing became available, he brought a motion seeking to compel DNA testing under the discovery statutes pertaining to criminal trials. This motion was denied. Following our decision in State v. Freeman, 253 Neb. 385,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Hawk v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. People v. WashingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Summerville v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. NesbittNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Gould v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  4. State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. SoukharithNebraska Supreme Court · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API