Legal Opinion

Durham v. I. C. T. Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 30, 1955No. 14996PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Chief Justice.

This suit was filed by appellants Gertrude A. Durham and Wilson Motors, Inc., as plaintiffs against Insurance Company -of Texas on a combination automobile insurance policy following a collision in which a car valued at $687 alleged to be owned by appellant Durham was a total loss. Appellant Wilson Motors, Inc. was the mortgagee named in a loss payable paragraph of the policy. Summary judgment was rendered against appellants.

The policy contains this provision: “6a. Except with respect to bailment lease, conditional sale, mortgage or other encumbrance the named insured is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Ford v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Schuster v. L. Bauman Jewelry Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Loud v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Ware v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pioneer Casualty Company v. BushCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  2. Estate of CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  3. Washington v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. City of Kennedale v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Hudgens v. Texas Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API