Legal Opinion

Ware v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 31, 1952No. 14534PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOND, Chief Justice.

Appellant V. L. Ware, as plaintiff in the court below, instituted suit against appellees E. Roy Wright and Edward C. Fritz, and two others, not parties in this appeal, jointly and severally for damages actual and exemplary allegedly resulting from malicious prosecution. This is an appeal from a summary judgment rendered in tire suit on motion of Wright and Fritz, defendants, under Rule 166-A, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, that the plaintiff take nothing as to them and that said defendants go hence with their costs. At the time of the entry of the judgment the plaintiff…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. C.I.T. Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1984
  2. Durham v. I. C. T. Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Yianitsas v. Mercantile National Bank at DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Jones v. HortenstineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. St. John v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API