Washington v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BREWSTER, Justice.
This is a Workmen’s Compensation case in which the plaintiff, Melvin Hugh Washington, sought to recover benefits for total and permanent disability. The jury found in answer to Issue No. 1 that Washington did not sustain an injury on or about the date he alleged that he had been injured. Based on this verdict the trial court rendered judgment in favor of the defendant, The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, and plaintiff has appealed.
The plaintiff’s 4th point of error is that the jury’s answer to Issue No. 1 is so against the great weight and preponderance of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. McCardellTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Ford v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. MurphreeTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Nass v. NassTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Smith v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commercial Standard Fire & Marine Co. v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. AlmuinaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Armando Mata v. Brooks Petroleum Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2003
- Steve Person, Jim Walesa, and Trident Healthcare Properties I, LP v. MC-Simpsonville, SC-1-UT, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2021
- in Re: Wendell Reeder, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015