Legal Opinion
Miller v. Motorola, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 10, 1977No. 77 C 2004PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FLAUM, District Judge:
The instant action arises under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17, and concerns a claim of sex discrimination. In her complaint, plaintiff alleges that she was employed by defendant, Motorola, Inc., as an attorney from April, 1974 until April 15, 1976 when she was laid off or terminated by Motorola. Plaintiff alleges that her termination was due to certain sex discrimination policies applied by defendant.
Presently before the court is defendant’s motion to strike the class action allegations of plaintiff’s complaint.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Pandis v. Sikorsky Aircraft Division of United Technologies Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
- Sweet v. General Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Clark v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. RenfrowDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1979
- Long v. Thornton Township High School District 205District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Garrett v. R. J. Reynolds Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1978
- Jones v. MacMillan Bloedel Containers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.