Legal Opinion

Wuthrich v. King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2016No. 91555-5PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYu, J.

¶1 A municipality’s duty to maintain its roadways in a reasonably safe condition for ordinary travel is not confined to the asphalt. If a wall of roadside vegetation makes the roadway unsafe by blocking a driver’s view of oncoming traffic at an intersection, the municipality has a duty to take reasonable steps to address it. In this case, there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether this duty was breached and whether any breach proximately caused petitioner Guy Wuthrich’s injuries. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Facts and Procedural History

¶2 On June 20, 2008, at…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ruff v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Keller v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Owen v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RR Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Owen v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sheila Larose, Appellant/cross-resp v. King County And Pda, Respondent/cross-appellantsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  2. H.B.H. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. Nichols v. Peterson Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. Thomas L. Sluman v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. City of Seattle v. Monsanto Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API