Legal Opinion
H.B.H. v. State
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 13, 2016No. 47438-7-IIPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*80[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals April 18, 2017.]
Bjorgen, C.J.
¶1 KMH, HBH, SAH, KEH, and JBH1 (collectively the children) appeal the trial court’s partial dismissal of some of their claims through a CR 50 motion for judgment as a matter of law, as well as an evidentiary ruling and the final judgment in favor of the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS). Their claims were related to incidents of child abuse by their foster, and later adoptive, parents, Scott and Drew Anne Hamrick.
¶2 The children contend that the trial court erred by (1) dismissing under CR 50 their claims…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Niece v. Elmview Group HomeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Niece v. Elmview Group HomeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Hutchins v. 1001 Fourth Avenue AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Roberson v. PerezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- H.B.H. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- Judith Cox v. Wa Dept. Social & Health Svcs.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Courtney Allen, Et Ano. v. Todd Zonis, Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Davis v. StrusDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
- Davis v. Washington State Department of Social and Health ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.