Legal Opinion
In Re Retail Wheeling Tariffs
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 26, 1998No. Docket Nos. 187387, 187388, 189396, 187397, 189480, 189481, 189503 and 189504PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
In these consolidated cases, appellants Detroit Edison Company, Dow Chemical Company, Consumers Power Company, and the Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity (abate) claim appeals from an order entered on June 19, 1995, by the Michigan Public Service Commission establishing a framework for an experimental retail wheeling program for Edison and Consumers. The Attorney General has filed a claim of cross-appeal in Edison’s appeal. We affirm in all respects.
In 1992, abate sought approval of an experimental retail wheeling tariff for Consumers. The term “retail wheeling” refers to a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Consumers Power Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Consumers Power Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1999