Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Scott
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 16, 1941No. Civ. 12667PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J. pro tem.
The defendants, Hugh Scott and The Pullman Company, appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff Tracy C. Hicks, in a suit for personal injuries. In his complaint said plaintiff alleges that he was a passenger for hire on a car of defendant, The Pullman Company, and that after he had retired to his berth for the night the defendant Scott attacked him and with force and violence pulled him from his berth so as to cause him to strike his back on a portion of the car, thus inflicting on him the injuries complained of, and that prior to this assault the plaintiff summoned the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shea v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Nevin v. Pullman Palace Car Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1883
- Pullman Company v. HoyleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Schwerin v. H. C. Capwell Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Calder v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Berger v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Terrell v. Key SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Diel v. BaxterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Sandvold v. PerrotCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Berger v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.