Legal Opinion

Akinmulero v. United States Attorney General

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided August 7, 2020No. 2:20-cv-01135Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 OLASEBIKAN N. AKINMULERO, 8 NO. C20-1135RSL Plaintiff, 9 v. ORDER REQUIRING MORE 10 DEFINITE STATEMENT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, 11 et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 On August 6, 2020, plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis was granted and 16 his complaint was accepted for filing. The complaint lists five defendants, two federal agencies 17 and three cabinet-level positions. Dkt. # 5 at 1. Although plaintiff asserts that he is bringing suit 18 against state or local officials under

42 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Hancock Park Capital II, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Donath v. THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICASupreme Court of the United States · 1806

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API