Jones v. Crescent City Ice Mfg. Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.
This is a suit for compensation. It is brought under the provisions of Act No. 20 of 1914 and the acts amendatory thereof. In the civil district court the defendant excepted to the jurisdiction of the court and also filed an answer to the merits. The case was tried upon the exception and merits. The exception was not directly passed upon, but the trial court dismissed plaintiff’s suit upon the ground that the accident did not happen to the deceased during the course of his employment. The case was appealed, and the Court of Appeal of Orleans held that the judgment rendered on the merits was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Gonsalves v. Moose Dry Dock & Repair Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Claim of Sullivan v. Hudson Navigation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Orleans Dredging Co. v. FrazieMississippi Supreme Court · 1935
- Independence Indemnity Co. v. MansfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Haynes v. Luckenbach Gulf S. S. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
- Stearns v. Love Drilling Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927