Legal Opinion

United States v. Long

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 19, 1959No. Crim. 1108-58PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.

Defendants have been indicted for violations of the District of Columbia Code provisions 1 prohibiting gambling and for violation of the United States Code provision 2 requiring the payment of a tax as a prerequisite to engaging in the business of accepting wagers.

Two motions have been filed. Defendant Jackson seeks the dismissal of counts one through seven of the indictment, or, in the alternative, the striking of counts two through seven. Defendant Virginia Johnson seeks the suppression of evidence seized at 1403 F Street, N. E., D. C.

Count one of the indictment…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Gore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Samuel Rosencranz v. United States of America, Anthony Dipietro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  2. People v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  3. The PEOPLE v. MontgomeryIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  4. United States v. BoschDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1962
  5. Hemler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API