Legal Opinion

Salazar v. Steelman

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 24, 1937No. Civ. 11303PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIiouser, P. J.

A trust deed that was security for an indebtedness owed by defendant to some person other than plaintiff having been “foreclosed”, plaintiff instituted an action to recover a judgment against defendant on a promissory note that was owned by plaintiff, the payment of which purportedly having been secured by a second trust deed upon the same property that theretofore had been sold on the “foreclosure” of the first indebtedness. A judgment that was rendered in that action in favor of the plaintiff was reversed on appeal. Thereupon, plaintiff caused to be entered her dismissal of the action.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brooks v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Skinner v. . TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Davis v. Steuben School TownshipIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Bruskey v. BruskeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Garroway v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. H. D. Arnaiz Ltd. v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Security Truck Line v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Aldrich v. San Fernando Valley Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Glendale v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. In Re the Marriage of KerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API