Legal Opinion

Garroway v. Jennings

California Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1922No. L. A. No. 7324PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, C. J.

The complaint states a cause of action to recover judgment against the two defendants. It alleges that the defendant Jennings became indebted to Lantz, Plyatt, and Garroway in the sum of $972.66 for services as her attorneys in two certain actions, in one of which a judgment was recovered in her favor for over $7,000, that thereafter she assigned the judgment to the defendant Davis, who, in' consideration of said assignment, promised his codefendant that he would pay the said attorneys’ fees due to the said Lantz, Hyatt, and Garroway, and that said parties before the action was begun assigned…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Security Truck Line v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Glendale v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Weinberger v. ManningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Willett v. Schmeister Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Salazar v. SteelmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API