Legal Opinion
Hild v. Samaritan Health Partner
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 5, 2024No. 2023-1076PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 177 Ohio St.3d 121.] HILD, ADMR. OF THE ESTATE OF BOLDMAN, APPELLEE, v. SAMARITAN HEALTH PARTNERS ET AL., APPELLANTS; ET AL. [Cite as Hild v. Samaritan Health Partners,
2024-Ohio-3338.] Civil law—Negligence—Same-juror rule applies in all negligence cases in which jury answers sequential interrogatories that separate the elements of negligence to reach a general verdict—The same three-fourths of jurors must concur on all elements of negligence for a verdict finding a defendant liable for negligence to be valid—Court of appeals’…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Arbino v. Johnson & JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Castlebrook, Ltd. v. Dayton Properties Ltd. PartnershipOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Cleveland Ry. Co. v. HallidayOhio Supreme Court · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilkes v. Ohio Dept. of Transp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025