Legal Opinion

Bountiful City v. De Luca

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1930No. 4883PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

This action was brought by Bountiful City to restrain the defendants from keeping or grazing goats or other live stock within 300 feet on either side of a creek known as Stone creek, its tributaries and sources of supply, some of the waters of which are used by the city and its inhabitants for culinary and domestic purposes; and from permitting goats or other live stock to drink out of such creek of any of its tributaries or sources of supply and from in any manner contaminating or befouling any of such waters. The plaintiff was given judgment so restraining the defendants, from which they…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. State ex rel. Milwaukee Medical College v. ChittendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. State v. RedmonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Hedderich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Donnelly v. DeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Adams v. Portage Irrigation Reservoir & Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Wellsville East Field Irr. Co. v. Lindsay Land & Livestock Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Steptoe Live Stock Co. v. GulleyNevada Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State v. FinneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API