Legal Opinion
BASF Corp. v. Sublime Restorations, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 26, 2012No. Civil Action No. 10-11160-MBBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET ENTRY # 19); PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S PROPOSED EXPERT TESTIMONY (DOCKET ENTRY # 23)
MARIANNE B. BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before this court is a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule 56”), filed by plaintiff BASF Corporation (“plaintiff’). (Docket Entry # 19). Also pending is plaintiffs motion to strike the proposed expert testimony of defendant Julian John Miller (“Miller”). Miller and defendant Sublime Restorations, Inc. (“Sublime”) (collectively…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Higgins v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Ruiz-Troche v. Pepsi Cola of Puerto Rico Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rothbaum v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
- Carando Gourmet Frozen Foods Corp. v. Axis Automation, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020