Legal Opinion
O'Dea v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Works
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 27, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The vital question which this appeal presents, is whether the plaintiff was a partial dependent of her son, the deceased employee. The commissioner found he had been employed by the defendant for less than two calendar weeks when, on April 30th, 1930, he was injured and died. He was twenty-two years of age, unmarried, and lived with his parents. The household consisted of the father and mother, the former being a railroad engineer, a brother Matthew of the age of twenty-five years, employed, a sister of seventeen, in school, and two younger brothers, aged fourteen and five years respectively.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Kennerson v. Thames Towboat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Driscoll v. Jewell Belting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Blanton v. Wheeler & Howes Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Draus v. International Silver Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wheat v. Red Star Express LinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Colby v. VarneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951
- Gagliardi v. Downing & Perkins, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- O'Shea v. Remington-Rand, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935