Simpson v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WARREN, Justice.
Appellant was charged by indictment with delivery of a simulated controlled substance. A jury found appellant guilty, and the court, having found two enhancement paragraphs true, assessed punishment at *54130 years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.
In three points of error, appellant complains that: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support the jury verdict; (2) there is a fatal variance between the proof offered and the allegations in the indictment; and (3) if the conviction is affirmed, he will be denied due process because the allegations in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- United States v. Houshang SheikhCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ex Parte Andrews, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- Cleveland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.