Legal Opinion
Roadtechs, Inc. v. MJ Highway Technology, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided February 8, 2000No. Civ.A. 3:99CV573PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAYNE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, RoadTechs, Inc. (“RoadTechs”) has filed a Motion to Show Cause against the defendants, MJ Highway Technology, Ltd. (“MJ Highway”) and Marketing Associates, Inc. (“MAI”) to show cause why they should not be held in contempt of a Consent Order entered by the Court on September 3, 1999 (“the Consent Order”). 1 RoadTechs has also filed a Motion to Modify the Consent Order, seeking to have the injunction against it removed and asking the Court to withdraw the reference to arbitration.
For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that MJ Highway…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- John W. Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., a New York Corporation and Volkswagenwerk, A. G., a Foreign Corporation, Wolfsburg, Western GermanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- William Morris Jeanne Morris v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Randal LongfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Riggs v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Midlands Utility, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2000
- New Jersey v. Gloucester Environmental Management Services, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008