In Re Midlands Utility, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOHN E. WAITES, Bankruptcy Judge.
Based upon the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as recited in the attached Order of the Court, Midlands Utility, Inc.’s Motion to Amend Order of Confirmation Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9024 is denied.
ORDER
THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Midlands Utility, Inc.’s (“Debtor”) Motion to Amend Order of Confirmation Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9024 (the “Motion”), filed with the Court on May 5, 2000. Debtor seeks relief from a specific provision of the Order of Confirmation, entered by the Court on February 1, 1995, on the grounds that it is no…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Williams v. VukovichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Brown v. NeebCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Western Electric Company, Inc. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Bellsouth Corporation, Bell Atlantic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Petition of the Board of Directors of Hopewell International InsuranceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- King's Grant Golf Acquisition, LLC Ex Rel. T 2 Green, LLC v. Abercrombie (In Re T 2 Green, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2007