Legal Opinion

Gordon v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 8, 2018No. CR–16–968PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaren R. Baker, Associate Justice

Appellant Ivor Gordon appeals from the denial of his pro se petition for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 (2016), which alleged the following grounds for relief: (1) that his trial counsel failed to seek suppression of Gordon's custodial statement; (2) that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to conduct an adequate pretrial investigation; (3) that trial counsel failed to interview witnesses, "allege codefendants," and investigate all statements *590and notes that were a part of the record or discovery, i.e., counsel failed to investigate…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Henington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Noel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fred L. Williams v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  3. Darrell Dennis v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  4. Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  5. Maiden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API