Gordon v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtKaren R. Baker, Associate Justice
Appellant Ivor Gordon appeals from the denial of his pro se petition for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 (2016), which alleged the following grounds for relief: (1) that his trial counsel failed to seek suppression of Gordon's custodial statement; (2) that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to conduct an adequate pretrial investigation; (3) that trial counsel failed to interview witnesses, "allege codefendants," and investigate all statements *590and notes that were a part of the record or discovery, i.e., counsel failed to investigate…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Henington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Noel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fred L. Williams v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
- Darrell Dennis v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
- Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
- Maiden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.