Legal Opinion

Maiden v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 6, 2019No. CR-17-777PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobin F. Wynne, Associate Justice

Appellant Donnie Maiden appeals from the denial by the trial court of his pro se petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 (2013). He alleges that the trial court erred with respect to its decision to deny relief on four of his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. In addition to his four points for reversal of the order, Maiden also asks by motion for an extension of time to file a reply brief in the appeal. As it is clear from the face of the petition that Maiden did not substantiate with facts a ground for relief in his Rule 37.1…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Henington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Springs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Darrell Dennis v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  2. Eric Carter v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
  3. Lazaro Veneros-Figueroa v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
  4. William Edward Gray v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
  5. Zavier Marquis Pree v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API