Legal Opinion
In Re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided December 13, 2000No. 99MDL1317PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT ZENITH’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SEITZ, District Judge.
After defendant Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [“Zenith”] moved for summary judgment on the plaintiffs’ federal antitrust complaints [D.E. No. 77, Civ. No. 98-3125; D.E. No. 45, Civ. No. 99-1938], the Sherman Act Plaintiffs 1 sought a partial summary judgment [D.E. No. 21, Civ. No. 99-MDL-1817] that defendant Abbott Laboratories [“Abbott”] contracted with defendants Zenith and Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [“Geneva”], to secure the entire…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Valley Drug Co. v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Joblove v. Barr Labs. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- In Re K-Dur Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Valley Drug Company v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- In Re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.