Legal Opinion

State v. Early

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 29, 1950No. 509PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'WiNBORNE, J.

The evidence shown in the record on this appeal, when considered in the light most favorable to the State, is sufficient to take the case to the jury. Hence the assignments of error based on exceptions to the denial of defendant’s motions, aptly made, for judgment as of nonsuit are not sustained.

But the exception upon which assignment of error No. 28 is based is well taken. It has its setting in this portion of the charge of the trial court to the jury: “Now, the defendant interposes the plea of an accident. The court will give you the legal definitions of an accident which would…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. State v. . WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. State v. . BlankenshipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. KluckhohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. FoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API