Legal Opinion

State v. Fox

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 27, 1973No. 7311SC281PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

In his first assignment of error, defendant contends that it was improper for the trial court to allow State’s witness, Anthony Hooker, age 9, to testify after his competency as a witness had been challenged. We do not agree.

Upon defendant’s objection the trial court conducted a voir dire examination in the absence of the jury and upon being asked why he placed his hand on the Bible before testifying, Anthony Hooker stated, “ [S] o to tell the truth.” The trial court then concluded that the witness had sufficient intelligence and knowledge to give evidence. In State v. Turner,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. State v. WynnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. RummageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. RayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API