Legal Opinion

People v. Johnny O.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 2003No. E031600PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHLI, Acting P. J.

In 1975, the California Legislature deliberately decriminalized the possession of a device for smoking marijuana. Nevertheless, the trial court found that appellant Johnny O. violated the law by possessing two bongs—devices for smoking marijuana. It reasoned that the possession of a device for smoking tetrahydrocannabinols is still a crime and that all marijuana contains tetrahydrocannabinol. The Legislature, however, limited the meaning of “tetrahydrocannabinols” in this context to synthetic tetrahydrocannabinols. Thus, appellant did not violate the law.

I

Factual…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hunt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. FeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. DerenneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Michael S. CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API