People v. Johnny O.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHLI, Acting P. J.
In 1975, the California Legislature deliberately decriminalized the possession of a device for smoking marijuana. Nevertheless, the trial court found that appellant Johnny O. violated the law by possessing two bongs—devices for smoking marijuana. It reasoned that the possession of a device for smoking tetrahydrocannabinols is still a crime and that all marijuana contains tetrahydrocannabinol. The Legislature, however, limited the meaning of “tetrahydrocannabinols” in this context to synthetic tetrahydrocannabinols. Thus, appellant did not violate the law.
I
Factual…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Hunt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. FeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. DerenneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Michael S. CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2014