Legal Opinion
Zurich Capital Markets Inc. v. Coglianese
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 2, 2004No. 03 C 7960PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ST. EVE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs commenced this action against Defendants alleging violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange. Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, 15 U.S. §§ 80b-6 and 80b-15, and various state law claims. Plaintiffs base their claims on an alleged fraudulent investment scheme carried out by Defendants through a Bahamian mutual fund called M.J. Select Global Fund, Ltd.
Defendants 1 have moved to dismiss this securities fraud amended complaint pursu…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- ABN AMRO, Inc. v. Capital International Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Zurich Capital Markets Inc. v. CoglianeseDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Baxter v. Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- Davis v. SPSS, INC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Zurich Capital Markets Inc. v. CoglianeseDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.