Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Griffith v. Bone

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1926No. 26,508PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the bank commissioner to sell bonds pledged as evidence of good faith by certain member banks under the bank guaranty law for the payment of certain unpaid assessments levied by the bank commissioner against such banks, and, under the declaratory judgment act, for the interpretation of the provisions of the bank guaranty law as to the liability of banks once members of the guaranty fund, but which had voluntarily withdrawn therefrom, or had liquidated their affairs and ceased to do a banking…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Kidder v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Wirtz v. NestosNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Chapman v. Guaranty State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  5. Assaria State Bank v. DolleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hubbell Bank v. BryanNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Mizer v. Kansas Bostwick Irrigation District No. 2Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  3. Thompson v. BoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Meyers v. Kansas State Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Smith v. KoenekeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API