Legal Opinion
United States v. Hughes Ranch, Inc.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided January 21, 1999No. 4:94CV3098, 4:94CV3099PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KOPF, District Judge.
These eases are consolidated. 1 They present interesting questions regarding the inter play between federal and state law when the United States seeks to foreclose (enforce) mortgages and security interests in federal court.
There are three pending motions for summary judgment. These motions are largely based upon uncontroverted material facts set forth in the pretrial conference order. There are other material facts, but they too are undisputed. As a result, all of the motions will be granted to one degree or another.
Hughes Ranch, Inc., Michael B.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity, Plaintiff v. James H. Petersen, Henry Heidtbrink, and Jerry R. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Ruth G. Thornburg Michael D. Thornburg David Jean Thornburg Kathy Ann NorthingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hibbing Taconite Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Mark Alan Kreutzer, Jr. and Amy Jean KreutzerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2021