Legal Opinion
State v. Celikoski
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided January 7, 1994No. A-4555PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COATS, Judge.
On October 1, 1991, Mefail Celikoski filed an application for post-conviction relief, alleging that he had been denied conflict-free representation as guaranteed by the United States and Alaska Constitutions. 1 Following a hearing, Superior Court Judge Milton Souter granted post-conviction relief. The state appeals. We affirm.
On January 9,1986, Mefail Celikoski, Ajra-din Celikoski, and Medzait Ramadanoski were indicted, on six counts of third-degree misconduct involving a controlled substance. An Illinois attorney, Robert Novelle, was hired as counsel for Ramadanoski.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Moreau v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. OlsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Mercer v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Lundin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Newby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1998
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
- State of Alaska v. Jason Lee CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019