Newby v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
In 1993, Alan R. Newby was convicted of murdering a Fairbanks man named Mark Lacy. Three years later, Newby petitioned the superior court for post-conviction relief. In his petition, Newby asserted that he received ineffective assistance from his trial attorney, Dick Madson. Newby contended that Madson might have defended him better in various ways, but Newby’s primary allegation was that Madson should not have represented him at all because Madson had a conflict of interest.
Superior Court Judge Mary E. Greene found that Madson had not had a conflict of interest, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Risher v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Moreau v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Simeon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2004
- State v. HarrisNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- Coffman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
- Osborne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.