Veloz v. Foremost Ins. Co. Grand Rapids
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
Ann Aiken, United States District Judge
In this diversity action, plaintiff Sabino Veloz moves for partial summary judgment against defendant Foremost Insurance Company for damages relating to the flooding of plaintiff's property. Defendant cross-moves for summary judgment, citing three provisions from the parties' insurance policy ("the policy") that purportedly exclude the flood damage from coverage. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff's motion is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant's motion is also granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
The following facts are…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Diaz v. Eagle Produce Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Foraker v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
- 12W RPO, LLC v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
- Bracken v. USAA General Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Foraker v. USAA Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Gunderson LLC v. BCG Properties Group, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.