Legal Opinion

Transamerica Insurance v. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 10, 1972PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTauro, C.J.

In this suit in equity for declaratory relief, the defendant Norfolk and Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance Company (Norfolk) appeals from a final decree, declaring that the plaintiff Peirce is an “insured” under the noncompulsory coverage B of the defendant Wheatley’s Massachusetts motor vehicle policy with Norfolk, and further declaring that a similar policy issued by the plaintiff Transamerica Insurance Company (Transamerica) to Peirce provided “excess” coverage and was thus .secondary to Norfolk’s “primary” coverage.

The pertinent facts as agreed to and found by the judge are as follows. On June…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. American Automobile Insurance Co. v. Republic Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Simmon v. Iowa Mutual Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Maryland Cas. Co. v. American Family Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. American Fire and Casualty Company v. ColluraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Open Software Foundation, Inc., and Hewlett Packard Company v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. Worcester Insurance v. Fells Acres Day School, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. The Falmouth National Bank v. Ticor Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Mission Insurance v. United States Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  5. Hansen v. BarmoreColorado Court of Appeals · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API