Legal Opinion

Geoffrey, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 8, 2009PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

The present appeal is from a decision of the Appellate Tax Board (board) affirming the denial by the Commissioner of Revenue (commissioner) of an application by the taxpayer, Geoffrey, Inc. (Geoffrey), for the abatement of corporate excises assessed for the tax years ending January 31, 1997, *18through January 31, 2001. We granted Geoffrey’s application for direct appellate review. At issue is whether, consistent with the commerce clause, art 1, § 8, of the United States Constitution,1 the Commonwealth can impose a corporate excise tax, pursuant to G. L. c. 63, § 39, on a foreign corporation2…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Rylander v. Bandag Licensing Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  5. Opinion of Justices to House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lamtec Corp. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Direct Marketing Association v. BrohlCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. Classics Chicago, Inc. v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. In re Washington Mutual, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2012
  5. Lamtec Corp. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API