Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Olsen v. Rich

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 17, 1995No. 1931196PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Lillian Olsen and her husband Richard Olsen sued the defendants, Gary M. Rich, M.D.; Susan Bowden, R.N.; and Providence Hospital, alleging that they had negligently provided Lillian Olsen with medical care and treatment. The jury rendered a verdict for the defendants. The Olsens moved for a new trial, arguing that the trial court had erred in overruling their objection to the composition of the jury, based on Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712,90…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ex Parte BranchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Ex Parte BirdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. K.S. v. CarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Medlin v. CrosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Highler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Ex Parte SonnierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Looney v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Rodgers v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API