Parrish v. Tahtaras

McDONOUGH, Chief Justice.

Defendants appeal from an adverse judgment in an action by an architect, Lowell Parrish, for the value of his services in designing and planning a home for defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Tahtaras.

Defendants assail the findings of the trial court, sitting without a jury, the sufficiency of the findings of the court to support, the judgment, and the introduction of evidence based on quantum meruit, which was unpleaded until the complaint was amended. Plaintiff stands both on the sufficiency of the record to support the findings, and on the contract of services, including…