Legal Opinion

Valdez v. McKee

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1966No. 7668PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARMODY, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff appeals' from the denial of his application for an order requiring his employer and its insurer to furnish certain hospital, medical and surgical services. The trial court found that, from the date of the plaintiff’s injury, the employer, through its insurer, had furnished medical treatment and hospitalization at a cost of $409.71, and that subsequent to that time, the plaintiff without prior approval of the defendants or the court, had placed himself under the care of Dr. Peterson of Albuquerque, thereby incurring treatment and surgical costs in excess…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. George v. Miller & Smith, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Totton v. Long Lake Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Nasci v. Frank Paxton Lumber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Johnson v. Armstrong & ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Garcia v. New Mexico State Highway DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Montoya v. Anaconda Mining Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Cardenas v. United Nuclear Homestake PartnersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Wuenschel v. New Mexico Broadcasting Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Gregory v. Eastern New Mexico UniversityNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Provencio v. New Jersey Zinc Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API