Ramex, Inc. v. Northwest Basic Industries
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1ConcurrenceEdmonds, P. J.
I agree with the result in this case. I write separately because I believe that the majority unnecessarily overrules our holding in City of Portland v. One 1973 Chevrolet Corvette, 113 Or App 469, 833 P2d 1285 (1992).
*86This is an area of law that involves a number of cases from which conflicting legal rules could be drawn. My view of the existing law is that there are three general principles potentially in play. The first principle addresses the maintenance of an appeal by a prevailing party who is entitled to have the losing party perform some obligation under the judgment. The general rule…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Portland Construction Co. v. O'NeilOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Moore v. FloydOregon Supreme Court · 1872
- Edwards v. PerkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1879
- Cottrell Et Ux. v. Prier Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Staiger v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.