In Re B.,N.M.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
GANTMAN, J.:
¶ 1 Appellant, B.,L. (“Mother”), asks us to determine whether the parental rights of Appellee, Q.,G.A. (“Father”) should have been involuntarily terminated, where Mother’s petition for the involuntary termination under 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 2511(a)(1) was supported by competent evidence. After careful review of the pertinent law as applied to the facts herein, we hold the evidence presented was sufficient to support Mother’s petition for involuntary termination of Father’s parental rights under Section 2511(a)(1). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order denying the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In re B.L.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- In Re Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights of BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- In the Interest of A.L.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- In Re Adoption of AtencioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- In the Interest of K.Z.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- In re Z.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- In re Adoption of C.L.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- In re I.J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- In the Interest of A.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.