Legal Opinion

In re Z.P.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 9, 2010PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

GANTMAN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Lycoming County Children and Youth Agency (“Agency”), appeals from the order entered in the Ly-coming County Court of Common Pleas, which denied the Agency’s petition to terminate Father’s parental rights with respect to his minor child, Z.P. Upon a thorough review of the record, the arguments *1113presented, and the applicable law, we hold the court erred in denying the termination petition. Accordingly, we reverse the order denying the Agency’s petition and remand -with instructions to terminate Father’s parental rights.

¶ 2 The Orphans’ court opinion sets…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. In re L.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. In re B.L.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. In Re B.,N.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. In the Interest of A.L.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. In the Interest of LilleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. In re Adoption of S.P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. In re K.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. In the Interest of A.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. In the Interest of B.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. In re the Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights to E.M.I.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API