Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 2007No. A05-1882PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Justice.

Appellant Frederick Kemond Jackson appeals his conviction for first-degree murder while attempting to commit aggravated robbery. Jackson, who served as a look-out during the attempted robbery, argues that the evidence was insufficient to establish his liability as an accomplice and to demonstrate that the victim’s death was reasonably foreseeable. Jackson claims that the omission of an instruction regarding corroboration of accomplice testimony was erroneous and prejudicial. Jackson also asserts that he was prejudiced by erroneous admission of certain evidence and by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. AmosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. State v. StrommenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. PendletonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Holt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  5. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API