Legal Opinion

Dostmann v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 27, 1956PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

This appeal presents a question of the interpretation of provisions of the building zone regulations of the town of Glastonbury. The facts are as follows: The defendant Jack Leitao, who holds an option to purchase a parcel of land located in an industrial zone in Glastonbury, applied to the building inspector for a permit to construct on this parcel an outdoor drive-in theater. The inspector refused the permit and Leitao appealed to the defendant board of appeals. The board ordered the permit issued on the ground that a theater was a permitted use under article 3, § 7, of the regulations. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Rourke v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Corthouts v. Town of NewingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  3. Mitchell Land Co. v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  4. Brown, State's Attorney, Ex Rel. Gray v. QuintilianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  5. Rawson v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1848

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spring v. ConstantinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. Bahre v. HogbloomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. LaProvidenza v. State Employees' Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Melody v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  5. Oliver v. Zoning CommissionConnecticut Superior Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API