Dostmann v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
This appeal presents a question of the interpretation of provisions of the building zone regulations of the town of Glastonbury. The facts are as follows: The defendant Jack Leitao, who holds an option to purchase a parcel of land located in an industrial zone in Glastonbury, applied to the building inspector for a permit to construct on this parcel an outdoor drive-in theater. The inspector refused the permit and Leitao appealed to the defendant board of appeals. The board ordered the permit issued on the ground that a theater was a permitted use under article 3, § 7, of the regulations. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Rourke v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Corthouts v. Town of NewingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Mitchell Land Co. v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Brown, State's Attorney, Ex Rel. Gray v. QuintilianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Rawson v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1848
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Spring v. ConstantinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Bahre v. HogbloomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- LaProvidenza v. State Employees' Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Melody v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Oliver v. Zoning CommissionConnecticut Superior Court · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.