Aaron Raiser v. City of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Aaron Raiser appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations arising out of various stops performed by Los Angeles Police Department officers. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Stone v. Travelers Corp., 58 F.3d 434, 436-37 (9th Cir. 1995). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record, Thompson v. Paul, 547 F.3d 1055, 1058-59 (9th Cir. 2008), and we affirm.
The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Toguchi v. Soon Hwang ChungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- (PC) Handy v. CastilloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Doe v. Government of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Simmons v. KohDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021