Legal Opinion
Morrone v. Pension Fund of Local No. One, I.A.T.S.E.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 14, 2017No. Docket No. 16-723-cvPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHIN, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Vincent Morrone appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Crotty, /,), dismissing his claim that an amendment to a pension plan offered by defendant-appellee the Pension Fund of Local No. One, I.A.T.S.E. (the “Pension Fund”), violated the anti-cutback provisions of the' Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”). We conclude that the amendment did ' not violate ERISA’s anti-cutback rule, and we therefore affirm.
BACKGROUND
The facts are largely undisputed and are…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mihalik v. Credit Agricole Cheuvreux North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- LOCKHEED CORP. Et Al. v. SPINKSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. HeinzSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Esden v. Bank of BostonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marceaux v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Aracich v. The Board of Trustees of The Employee Benefit Funds of Heat & Frost Insulators Local 12District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Grosso v. AT&T Pension Benefit PlanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- McCutcheon v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020